From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Feb 12 06:16:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA02357 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 06:16:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fly.HiWAAY.net (root@fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA02352 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 06:16:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sprice@hiwaay.net) Received: from bonsai.hiwaay.net (tnt3-171.HiWAAY.net [208.147.146.171]) by fly.HiWAAY.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA00628; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 08:15:59 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <34E30481.1CFBAE39@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 08:17:37 -0600 From: Steve Price X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ac199@hwcn.org CC: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp://freebsd.org - RIP References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > [Cc: changed to -ports] > > Do you mean patches to existing ports? I mean all ports new or fixed. Yes there are logs for the mailing lists but the bug report log (GNATS) is where the bug fixes and new features should reside. > Asami has been in the past an outspoken fan of unified diffs. > The handbook states (I believe) to use context diffs whenever > sending patches to FreeBSD, except when upgrading ports, where > unidiffs should be used. Probably because he is responsible for the ports tree and prefers unified diffs? :) > A diff is a diff. I like the uni-diffs, but if someone > submits something in a context diff, I'm not going to complain. I agree. I won't throw a diff away even if I have to spend extra time fixing snarf-n-barf. My point is that if the majority of committers prefer one over the other we should encourage the preferred method (style(9) is one such practice). On the same token we should be thankful (and I know we are) that we get fixes, bug reports, etc. and shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth. > I also prefer a shar archive to a tarball. They can be quickly > read from the -bugs list, and some people are somehow managing to > screw-up included uu files. I'd prefer to see our major ports > committers (vanilla, jseger, etc.) say what they prefer, since > they handle the majority of ports. I like shar archives too, but them not being compressed causes bandwidth problems, IMO. Don't get me wrong I prefer clear text solutions to the gunk that gzip produces, but I don't want to have to CVSup 1MB of new problem reports a day because we encourage people to _only_ send uncompressed diffs/ports/archives to GNATS. Steve > -- > tIM...HOEk > OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names > hoping that the resultant code will run faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message