From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 27 08:49:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676F6E2E6A8 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@krion.cc) Received: from krion.cc (krion.cc [148.251.235.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DB46993C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@krion.cc) Received: from krion.cc (krion.cc [148.251.235.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by krion.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F8B0B1380; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:48:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:48:57 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarev To: Tilman =?iso-8859-1?Q?Keskin=F6z?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing. Message-ID: <20170927084857.rpwyo7eyqiudl2w5@krion.cc> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="arl2sfmryhhmvhff" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:49:03 -0000 --arl2sfmryhhmvhff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/27, Tilman Keskin=F6z wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 2017-09-27 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 27/09/2017 07:11, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> Is there a document/paper on what this is and what it's limits are etc? > >=20 > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsAndSubPackages > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsMigration > >=20 >=20 > These pages don't contain any information what this is, how it differs > from/interacts with the OPTIONS framework and why I would want to > convert a port to FLAVORS. I'd like to ask portmgr team to provide this information as well as their vision for future correlations between OPTIONS, FLAVORS and slave ports. K. --arl2sfmryhhmvhff Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEJCHRFhEAQujKni1pDyI9/LMCykUFAlnLZfkACgkQDyI9/LMC ykXcAwgAp3JU1CeE/7ZnlSzYoobKQBgFRoBbSXAcAfKPjB1OpV3GjQiIGCA6jVsq SstzptEJZMXXBHT1u8kCRBQjWGa9N9zVtFFBCOI4WpdkBTcGkbQ3LstEX9xPB/17 KZ46JaBPLMwcUSGiasE+o3riC/303E316bvS2zytf2EAWp1egxL4QvzOSmcOEZHv EsIDRCWxoaFPq7db99aIjXC8tx1xcfjPmmjIlVNkD9UWvvXTnOMSZXNIbd+MM5rQ q3HRuUyfL7AYtwzAQ5JRCZZMzaJl8+kx2GLlzeR7TstR52GpgkKC9T/3wqE//L6k s95CWcBI927HntAiJzxj0+vaeSNkSw== =44NT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --arl2sfmryhhmvhff--