From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 4 14: 0: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (s205m7.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3111015141 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 14:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id NAA84114; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199906042055.NAA84114@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: 3.2-stable, panic #12 In-Reply-To: <199906041228.HAA06346@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at "Jun 4, 99 07:28:49 am" To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, brian@Awfulhak.org, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, dyson@iquest.net, ahasty@mindspring.com, crossd@cs.rpi.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, schimken@cs.rpi.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG An attempt at a constructive idea... Regarding the comment that communicating via face to face meetings is vastly superior (and less emotionally draining) that communicating via email.. Why don't we send all of our VM experts (JD, DG, Matt, Alan, Poul, et.al.) to a 3-day "FreeBSD VM camp" (funded by the FreeBSD project), give them lots of white boards and markers, and see what they come up with? Like: a well thought out, detailed, and agreed-upon roadmap for future work. Maybe email is sufficient even for the single most critical and complex part of FreeBSD, but this whole Matt debacle seems like a counter-example to that. Just a thought. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message