From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 27 02:31:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6485F801 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7B18FC12 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hm6so3335884wib.13 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:31:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=egoCQxlQVAOr5cliI8xihoVwy+ck/ga6CU6WaOEvCWc=; b=zygoZsVygWf+o4xU2aBGiyM9xn1IKD80U+tTnflWAVzKV38MlQxyB7KEtXeZQuBGHE 6QZ43tCC0zapj/vJxiTNz5yTIVKjzbNi1gamkkrdP0x0IzAqKtmhQ2g6Z/odcB89C83F 93JkXzyEsMsZOURvBY/dK/vA84dZoOJ/4/cFrSRCSF5tOSxedOv3IeC91Zp9gychDSlg wXUm0BILC8FFy4bpXeqEstxIYemkI65+Nlu7fPXRxK/L0UPON5U89qDZOSybHudAj3oP xL5k5NNeqJK0YUjTS7T/Wv3OuOSb+XvLs04WQIbaQqA+RpOOSp08Ao+wQlqDVj0+XArx 9Hsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.200.160 with SMTP id z32mr5021624wen.53.1353983482946; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:31:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:31:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:31:22 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: csCBq6sXeqC_XywRPXOWL55UPm0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (Re) Verifying TDMA behaviour on -HEAD From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:31:24 -0000 .... and now TDMA works right with the 11n chips. They're only doing 11a rates for now, but the timer programming works. There's a bunch more work to do with the 11n chips and timer programming, mostly to figure out why the clock sync drift is slightly worse/different than the 11a cards. But I don't think it's anything major. Please, go forth and test it out. Adrian