From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sat Feb 4 16:37:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231CDCD09D6; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ngie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org (repo.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6068::e6a:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7671B38; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ngie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.37]) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v14Gbix3070885; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:37:44 GMT (envelope-from ngie@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from ngie@localhost) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v14GbirE070884; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:37:44 GMT (envelope-from ngie@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201702041637.v14GbirE070884@repo.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repo.freebsd.org: ngie set sender to ngie@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Ngie Cooper Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:37:44 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r313222 - stable/10/contrib/bsnmp/snmp_usm X-SVN-Group: stable-10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:37:45 -0000 Author: ngie Date: Sat Feb 4 16:37:43 2017 New Revision: 313222 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313222 Log: MFC r311394: op_usm_users: don't deref uusers if it's NULL when SETting the value Add an XXX comment to note that the conditional seems suspect given how it's handled elsewhere in the SNMP_OP_SET case. CID: 1008573 Modified: stable/10/contrib/bsnmp/snmp_usm/usm_snmp.c Directory Properties: stable/10/ (props changed) Modified: stable/10/contrib/bsnmp/snmp_usm/usm_snmp.c ============================================================================== --- stable/10/contrib/bsnmp/snmp_usm/usm_snmp.c Sat Feb 4 16:36:07 2017 (r313221) +++ stable/10/contrib/bsnmp/snmp_usm/usm_snmp.c Sat Feb 4 16:37:43 2017 (r313222) @@ -169,8 +169,12 @@ op_usm_users(struct snmp_context *ctx, s val->var.subs[sub - 1] != LEAF_usmUserCloneFrom) return (SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME); + /* + * XXX (ngie): need to investigate the MIB to determine how + * this is possible given some of the transitions below. + */ if (community != COMM_INITIALIZE && - uuser->type == StorageType_readOnly) + uuser != NULL && uuser->type == StorageType_readOnly) return (SNMP_ERR_NOT_WRITEABLE); switch (val->var.subs[sub - 1]) {