From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 22 06:32:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD3B37B404; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godel.mtl.distributel.net (nat.MTL.distributel.NET [66.38.181.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751AD43F75; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:32:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com) Received: from godel.mtl.distributel.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h6M9aqEH058401; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:36:52 GMT (envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com) Received: (from bmilekic@localhost) by godel.mtl.distributel.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6M9aq5q058400; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:36:52 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: godel.mtl.distributel.net: bmilekic set sender to bmilekic@technokratis.com using -f Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:36:52 +0000 From: Bosko Milekic To: Hartmut Brandt Message-ID: <20030722093652.GE58118@technokratis.com> References: <200307221246.h6MCkVMg081118@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307221246.h6MCkVMg081118@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netatm atm_cm.c atm_socket.c atm_subr.c src/sys/netatm/ipatm ipatm_load.c src/sys/netatm/sigpvc sigpvc_if.c src/sys/netatm/spans spans_arp.c spans_cls.c spans_if.c src/sys/netatm/uni sscf_uni.c sscop.c uniarp.c uniip.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:32:48 -0000 On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:46:31AM -0700, Hartmut Brandt wrote: > harti 2003/07/22 05:46:31 PDT [...] > Also add rudimentary error handling in some places (panic) when a zone > cannot be created. This is probably a good move but, FWIW, these are never supposed to fail as the UMA zone creation code calls an allocation with M_WAITOK, regardless of who or where the caller is. -- Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@technokratis.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/