From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 21 11:09:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03B316A4CE for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:09:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spork.qfe3.net (spork.qfe3.net [212.13.207.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CB043D5C for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:09:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from [81.104.55.176] (helo=voi.aagh.net) by spork.qfe3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DZRrc-00018d-4x; Sat, 21 May 2005 12:09:52 +0100 Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DZRrb-000AGA-Rr; Sat, 21 May 2005 12:09:51 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 12:09:51 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst To: Chris Message-ID: <20050521110951.GB27958@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris , Tony Shadwick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050517144200.T26182@mail.goinet.com> <3aaaa3a05052005436414e0a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a05052005436414e0a3@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Not much. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Thomas Hurst X-RBL-Warning: 81.104.55.176 is in RBL blacklist at dnsbl.sorbs.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit is being stubborn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:09:56 -0000 * Chris (chrcoluk@gmail.com) wrote: > This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an update > is available to fix an exploit, but wget has no update so what is the > point of the warning, there also seems to be no way to shut it up. portaudit_fixed is only for OS bugs (i.e. associated with kern.osreldate). portaudit is just a shell script; if it bothers you that much, submit a patch to make it work for port problems too, or send-pr :) Looks like a case of moving the "if (fixedre && $2 ~ fixedre) next" line outside the "$1 ~ /^FreeBSD[<=>!]/ {" section around line 140, or something to that effect. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/