From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:19:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195C415295; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:19:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA25285; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:21:35 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:21:35 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120211801.01a4a4c0@localhost> from "Brett Glass" at Jan 20, 2000 09:18:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some mail from Brett Glass, sie said: > > At 06:48 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: > > >If you are using ipnat and have ipfilter installed, the work around is > >as follows: > > I'm not very experienced with IPFilter, so this may be an "newbie" question, > but why is ipnat necessary? It isn't. I said that for people who are using ipnat but not ipfilter. btw, I think the better way to write the 3 rules is: block in quick proto tcp from any to any head 100 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 pass in all Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message