Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:32:27 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: .Xr references to ports in man pages
Message-ID:  <20030426113227.GC9189@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030426103416.GA407@nitro.dk>
References:  <20030424233703.GB48527@nitro.dk> <ien0ie9z21.0ie@localhost.localdomain> <20030425202427.GC28920@sunbay.com> <t2ist29m45.st2@localhost.localdomain> <20030426103416.GA407@nitro.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:34:17PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2003.04.25 16:46:18 -0700, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
>=20
> > To avoid having erroneous information in the manpages before someone
> > discovers that the category has been changed without the changer
> > remembering and/or bothering to search all the manpages and fix all the
> > unnecessary category references which have gone bad.  That's too much to
> > expect to happen, methinks.  Also, to avoid the need to handle the
> > PRs that will then be (eventually) written after nearly every change.
> >=20
> > As for the SGML, the same thing applies, but I suspect it's too hard to
> > fix in the SGML processing, but I recommend easing SGML maintenance by
> > omitting the "CATEGORY/".  There's too much more useful stuff to
> > maintain, as it is, and "whereis" easily gives the category to anyone
> > who can't guess it.
>=20
> Is this really a big problem?  I't not that often ports get moved and
> since there is ports/MOVED it is very easy to use a script to once in a
> while automatically go through the references in the documentation and
> fix the references.
>=20
> If the category is not there it would also make it harder to make links
> to the port e.g. in man.cgi.
>=20
> That being said if others feel it is better to not specify ports it OK
> with me.  I mainly want to get rid of "bad" references.
>=20
Not, it's not OK with others.  Writing a simple script that finds
all port references and checks this with the fresh ports/ tree is
not that hard.  I've been planning on setting the manpages tinder
box; adding this feature to it would be trivial.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+qm5KUkv4P6juNwoRAkkzAJ92eFhPKSDgPOMf1F12E7t40OwX/wCfV784
UHC9LjroIcoVuCDyvRBoNXs=
=ereY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030426113227.GC9189>