Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:16:45 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r448270 - branches/2017Q3/devel/git Message-ID: <0037cbd8-0a02-c28c-0d61-9559e5aad34e@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <1503090809.2638339.1078004064.204EA724@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <201708182012.v7IKCDAU008546@repo.freebsd.org> <3c210e9f-145e-a434-6fb3-eb4bf8814c06@passap.ru> <1503090809.2638339.1078004064.204EA724@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
19.08.2017 00:13, Mark Felder пишет: > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, at 15:29, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> 18.08.2017 23:12, Mark Felder пишет: >>> -DISTVERSION= 2.14.1 >>> +DISTVERSION= 2.13.2 >> >> PORTEPOCH bump? >> >> > > Unfortunately you can't do a PORTEPOCH bump in a quarterly branch unless > you do it in HEAD as well or it will break upgrades in the future. > > This was intentionally reverted without a PORTREVISION bump due to the > following factors: > > 1) The 2.14.x update to git breaks devel/git-cinnabar as reported by > jbeich@. It should not have been merged to quarterly but there was a > miscommunication. > 2) Quarterly branches are 99% of the time (fake but plausible statistic > I made up) consumed as packages only > 3) This package has not yet hit our mirrors. Last package set build was > on 448018 > > I expect nobody to notice. This is not a wise gamble, but PORTEPOCH is a > painful scar and I'm hoping we can avoid it. If we get reports this has > actually affected someone I don't think we have a choice but to do a > PORTEPOCH. Got it. Thank you. -- WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0037cbd8-0a02-c28c-0d61-9559e5aad34e>