From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 10:17:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E83EDDF9BF; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:17:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward105p.mail.yandex.net (forward105p.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E396E94D; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from mxback10o.mail.yandex.net (mxback10o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::24]) by forward105p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D50D44081731; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:16:46 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp4j.mail.yandex.net (smtp4j.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1619::15:6]) by mxback10o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id UM072NnIqy-Gkpqm2FG; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:16:46 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=passap.ru; s=mail; t=1503137806; bh=2sgCrPCBKdFclbXhlhbZGQW6RvsttO4gojmMOOZ/9Ls=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To; b=nFM106hFqIi+dPvkafjQRwluIkRQJVZQfcsG/c/QSr4CubFoNAgc00mHcB8rFmE21 FYngCoof+1uMHnYTdWu0IAncjkEz97kYDaNgNqWzCBgRkhSHiPbH0CDPUqPCDQdoT1 yKA3RyR8PoDd38CFLvvH11ezRpySgO+OU45V4k2A= Received: by smtp4j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id gM63z4AsDN-Gk8CxxMU; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:16:46 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=passap.ru; s=mail; t=1503137806; bh=2sgCrPCBKdFclbXhlhbZGQW6RvsttO4gojmMOOZ/9Ls=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To; b=nFM106hFqIi+dPvkafjQRwluIkRQJVZQfcsG/c/QSr4CubFoNAgc00mHcB8rFmE21 FYngCoof+1uMHnYTdWu0IAncjkEz97kYDaNgNqWzCBgRkhSHiPbH0CDPUqPCDQdoT1 yKA3RyR8PoDd38CFLvvH11ezRpySgO+OU45V4k2A= Authentication-Results: smtp4j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@passap.ru Subject: Re: svn commit: r448270 - branches/2017Q3/devel/git To: Mark Felder , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org References: <201708182012.v7IKCDAU008546@repo.freebsd.org> <3c210e9f-145e-a434-6fb3-eb4bf8814c06@passap.ru> <1503090809.2638339.1078004064.204EA724@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <0037cbd8-0a02-c28c-0d61-9559e5aad34e@passap.ru> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:16:45 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1503090809.2638339.1078004064.204EA724@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: ru-RU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:17:00 -0000 19.08.2017 00:13, Mark Felder пишет: > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, at 15:29, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> 18.08.2017 23:12, Mark Felder пишет: >>> -DISTVERSION= 2.14.1 >>> +DISTVERSION= 2.13.2 >> >> PORTEPOCH bump? >> >> > > Unfortunately you can't do a PORTEPOCH bump in a quarterly branch unless > you do it in HEAD as well or it will break upgrades in the future. > > This was intentionally reverted without a PORTREVISION bump due to the > following factors: > > 1) The 2.14.x update to git breaks devel/git-cinnabar as reported by > jbeich@. It should not have been merged to quarterly but there was a > miscommunication. > 2) Quarterly branches are 99% of the time (fake but plausible statistic > I made up) consumed as packages only > 3) This package has not yet hit our mirrors. Last package set build was > on 448018 > > I expect nobody to notice. This is not a wise gamble, but PORTEPOCH is a > painful scar and I'm hoping we can avoid it. If we get reports this has > actually affected someone I don't think we have a choice but to do a > PORTEPOCH. Got it. Thank you. -- WBR, bsam