From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org  Mon May 29 10:23:30 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D7DCFAEA1
 for <freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 10:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3701740DA;
 Mon, 29 May 2017 10:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA14688;
 Mon, 29 May 2017 13:23:21 +0300 (EEST)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1dFHpZ-000MNg-Cy; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:23:21 +0300
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of .zfs/snapshot/* directories in respect to
 ".." path.
To: lev@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
References: <1acc5917-f10f-b18a-50e0-84661173e85d@FreeBSD.org>
 <e7f30e57-a065-dd10-e79a-9a4b770598b6@FreeBSD.org>
 <1601598008.20170529015948@serebryakov.spb.ru>
 <8138588b-4b03-16d9-77b6-2a3e3444997d@FreeBSD.org>
 <1279842496.20170529132006@serebryakov.spb.ru>
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <01c59f49-f45a-b02f-31f1-88c130609094@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 13:22:25 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1279842496.20170529132006@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:23:30 -0000

On 29/05/2017 13:20, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Andriy,
> 
> Monday, May 29, 2017, 9:09:58 AM, you wrote:
> 
>>>  (2) When I've reverted to r318576, this patch helps!
>> You probably meant r318716 again here?
>  Nope. r318576. 

Sorry, it was my confusion, I read "reverted to r318576" as "reverted r318576".

> I've found "snapshot .." bug at r318576 (see my first message),
> so when "latest" (I'm using local mirror, so it could be
> not-really-latest-one) revision — r319076 — crashed, I've reverted to
> exactly this "proven" revision — r318576. Patch for "snapshot .." was tested
> at r318576, and crash with and without patch for "snapshot" was at r319076.
> 
>> If yes, then it's probably exactly the same issue as we had in head: r308826.
>> Could you please test if that change helps?
>> I'll take care of this.
>  Now, as r319091 was committed, I'm building new fresh kernel.

Thank you.  Please let me know how it goes.

-- 
Andriy Gapon