From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Dec 26 01:37:42 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA15743
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 01:37:42 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ol.kyrnet.kg (ol.kyrnet.kg [195.254.160.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA15738
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 01:37:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mlists@gizmo.kyrnet.kg)
Received: from gizmo.kyrnet.kg (IDENT:mlists@gizmo.kyrnet.kg [195.254.160.13])
	by ol.kyrnet.kg (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA10282;
	Sat, 26 Dec 1998 14:05:55 +0600
Received: from localhost (mlists@localhost)
	by gizmo.kyrnet.kg (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA27154;
	Sat, 26 Dec 1998 14:35:43 +0500
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 14:35:43 +0500 (KGT)
From: CyberPsychotic <mlists@gizmo.kyrnet.kg>
Reply-To: fygrave@tigerteam.net
To: Barrett Richardson <brich@aye.net>
cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Do I really need inetd?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981224000443.29305A-100000@phoenix.aye.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9812261435140.16099-100000@gizmo.kyrnet.kg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

~ 
~ I have all my necessary network services running as daemons. In the
~ face of recent discoveries of problems caused for inetd by nmap
~ and various things I've come to the conclusion that I really don't
~ need inetd -- another variable I can eliminated from the mix.
~ 
~ Any undesirable side effects come to mind?

 nah.. not a one. I don't use inetd on some machines and very happy with
it;)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message