From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 16 16:22:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0248E106564A; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6E58FC12; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so3281298fxe.17 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.53.77 with SMTP id l13mr7160459fag.84.1310833334029; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.3] ([82.76.253.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r12sm1607684fam.0.2011.07.16.09.22.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Vlad Galu In-Reply-To: <20110717.004248.48765964696292481.hrs@allbsd.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:22:09 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <08E81571-34DA-41E2-B06E-3BFC9C046895@dudu.ro> References: <20110717.004248.48765964696292481.hrs@allbsd.org> To: Hiroki Sato X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FIB separation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:22:16 -0000 On Jul 16, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Vlad Galu wrote > in : >=20 > du> Hello, > du> > du> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that = enforced > du> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that the = best > du> approach would be the OpenBSD way - transporting the FIB number in = the > du> message and letting the user applications filter out unwanted > du> messages. > du> > du> Are there any plans to tackle this before 9.0? >=20 > I am looking into this and investigating other possible extensions in > rtsock messages such as addition of a fib member to rt_msghdr. I am > not sure it can be done before 9.0, though... >=20 > -- Hiroki Thanks! Even if this gets postponed for 10.0, living with a backport of = the official implementation would be easier than maintaining a homegrown solution. VG