From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 07:15:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593DF1065672 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 07:15:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleksandr@samoylyk.sumy.ua) Received: from mail.telesweet.net (news.telesweet.net [194.110.252.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EDE8FC2F for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleksandr@samoylyk.sumy.ua) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.telesweet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F94C437 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 10:15:30 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Telesweet Mail Virus Scanner X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44] Received: from [10.0.0.109] (pigeon-work.telesweet [10.0.0.109]) by mail.telesweet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61209B828 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 10:15:17 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <48215706.8080508@samoylyk.sumy.ua> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 10:15:18 +0300 From: Oleksandr Samoylyk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <48207C8B.4020509@samoylyk.sumy.ua> <48209BC4.5080602@elischer.org> <20080507040727.GA28983@verio.net> In-Reply-To: <20080507040727.GA28983@verio.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems with netgraph X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 07:15:35 -0000 David DeSimone wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: >> unfortunatly I've been totally ignoring this thread because it said >> "trouble with em" in the topic.. >> If you'd said "trouble with mpd" then maybe I'd have looked earlier.. > > In the poster's defense, the only symptom that started this was this > info from ps: > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 29 root 1 -68 - 0K 16K CPU5 5 196:41 100.00% em0 taskq > > So tracking it down to mpd has been a process of elimination in figuring > out why packets absorb so much CPU. > Here is a result of profiling: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017901.html -- Oleksandr Samoylyk OVS-RIPE