From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 17:08:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11871065677 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:08:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7079E8FC19 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:08:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F2B27B131 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.57]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01879ABB7A for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (dslb-092-075-111-224.pools.arcor-ip.net [92.75.111.224]) by mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDF22BCA0D for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:08:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5IH8tAo039381 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:08:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mailnull@kemoauc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5IH8tLn039380 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:08:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mailnull) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93/7407/Mon Jun 9 04:21:00 2008 on mail-in-17.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: regression-test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:08:57 -0000 So I just learned that pointyhat tries to run a target regression-test as part of the build. (Somebody asked me to use that target in a port.) Is this documented somewhere? In particular, running tests of what duration would be considered appropriate? E.g., building audio/flac takes a minute here, running the tests sixteen, which I suspect would be excessive. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de