Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:51:48 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> To: kde@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vijay Patel <patelvijayp.news@gmail.com>, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org>, gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gettext error Message-ID: <200704071151.50787.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <D14A42B7-36D5-42BA-B6C4-2B3EEFC32707@freebsd.org> References: <003901c778d8$e53b8260$0100a8c0@team1> <1175928275.59311.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <D14A42B7-36D5-42BA-B6C4-2B3EEFC32707@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 07 April 2007 11:32:19 Ade Lovett wrote:
> On Apr 06, 2007, at 23:44 , Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > Well, I've already expressed my opinion that threading be disabled.
> > Since FreeBSD doesn't allow mixing threaded libraries with non-
> > threaded
> > executables (without linking the executable with PTHREAD_LIBS) :-(,
> > threading is just dangerous. I don't think we want to force all ports
> > that link to libintl to become thread-aware.
>
> Yup. I think this is the way to go myself. I'd just like consensus
> from the KDE folks before I simply bump PORTREVISION and add --
> disable-threads to CONFIGURE_ARGS.
Sounds fine to me too. We've not had it threaded before, so not missed it
either.
Unless lofi has some strong objection to this, consider this an ok from kde@
Andy
--
Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk
| tap@kde.org
"In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org
we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704071151.50787.andy>