From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 09:40:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6380737B404 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.auriga.ru (mail.auriga.ru [80.240.102.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB91E43FA3 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:40:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex.neyman@auriga.ru) Received: from mail.loopback.interface ([127.0.0.1] helo=vagabond.auriga.ru) by mail.auriga.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19MsPG-00079M-M6; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:43:34 +0400 From: Alexey Neyman Organization: Auriga, Inc. To: "David O'Brien" Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:40:11 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200306020643.h526hGg8017066@repoman.freebsd.org> <200306021221.47700.alex.neyman@auriga.ru> <20030602150236.GE87972@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030602150236.GE87972@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306022039.29859.alex.neyman@auriga.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 atomic.c autoconf.c bios.c busdma_machdep.c critical.c db_disasm.c db_interface.c db_trace.c dump_machdep.c elan-mmcr.c elf_machdep.c genassym.c i386-gdbstub.c i686_mem.c identcpu.c in_cksum.c initcpu.c k6_mem.c legacy.c ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 16:40:20 -0000 hi, there! On Monday 02 June 2003 19:02, David O'Brien wrote: DO>> BTW, I have a patch that strips the version information (more precisely, DO>> .comment section, that contains $FreeBSD$ strings and a handful of DO>> compiler versions "GCC: (GNU) 3.2.2 [FreeBSD] 20030205 (release)") into DO>> a separate file and installs it under a separate name (${KMOD}.version DO>> or kernel.version). DO> DO> What's the problem with a large amount .comment section bits? They DO> should not be loaded into memory when an ELF file is loaded. The only DO> place it causes trouble is on the installation floppies when the size of DO> the file on disk is an issue -- but we strip out the .comment section DO> when building the floppy images. Well, sorry for the noise. I just checked that 5.0-RELEASE floppies contain the .comment section in the kernel. However, 5.1-BETA2 do not, that is, such stripping was introduced somewhere in between... This, of course, renders this patch useless. Regards, Alexey. -- A quoi ca sert d'etre sur la terre Si c'est pour faire nos vies a genoux?