From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 29 09:36:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA16366 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:36:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA16344 Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA03720; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:34:01 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199601291734.KAA03720@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: What printed documentation do we need? To: andreas@knobel.gun.de (Andreas Klemm) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:34:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: grog@lemis.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Andreas Klemm" at Jan 29, 96 12:04:06 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The following issues should be covered as well > > - Supported Hardware (-stable, -current, near future plans) > - Installation methods [ ... ] Let me second "Installation methods". This weekend, I helped someone install FreeBSD 2.1 using the boot disk from a CDROM and some twiddling. Initially they went to WWW.FreeBSD.ORG, but couldn't easily find the install disks or what to install. There was no top level install.doc, and (checking post-facto) the "get installed" code came in 3 levels deep. This is rather buried. It makes it very difficult for someone to pull the code down for an install. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.