From owner-cvs-all Tue May 19 11:37:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14527 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:37:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14120; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:35:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: (from hasty@localhost) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA03822; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:35:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty) Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 11:35:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Amancio Hasty Message-Id: <199805191835.LAA03822@rah.star-gate.com> To: eivind@yes.no, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci brooktree848.c Cc: ahasty@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, roger@cs.strath.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <19980519202629.45302@follo.net> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk True you can only override one unit at a time . Currently, the driver enables the bt848 variable during the open. Is there an easy way for me to trap the setting of a sysctl variable so that I can support setting N units or should the sysctl mechanism be extended to support the concept of units a la snmp? Tnks, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message