From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 17:36:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9AE16A4CE; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A994943D41; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:36:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id 10C3E308A0; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:36:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 507C41D1D39; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:36:36 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16416.19620.158157.793481@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:36:36 -0500 To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <4020468F.20800@freebsd.org> References: <16416.4726.600088.834482@canoe.dclg.ca> <4020468F.20800@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 14) "Reasonable Discussion" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: David Gilbert Subject: Re: 652 meg cd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:36:40 -0000 >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Long writes: >> ls -la 5.2.1-RC-i386-disc1.iso Scott> -rw-r--r-- 1 scottl archive 672792576 Jan 31 20:05 Scott> 5.2.1-RC-i386-disc1.iso >> dc Scott> 672792576 1024 / p 657024 1024 / p 641 Scott> That is to say that the image is 641MB, where a MB == MegaByte Scott> == 1024 * 1024 bytes. This is the standard way that CD Scott> capacities are measured. If your initial starting size is Scott> different from was I just pasted in, then you might want to Scott> check the MD5 and verify that what you have (or where you got Scott> it from) is not corrupt. No... that is the size I have ... but curiously burncd is refusing to put it onto a 650 meg CDRW that I have. It works just fine on the 700M CDR's that I have, tho. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================