From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Mar 20 21:39:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574EFAD7DE0 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E7E1E51 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3634DAD7DDF; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D2FAD7DDE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25251E4F; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p65so101219913wmp.0; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:39:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :mime-version; bh=Xy7l/nZ7towEIui2/8Pe4ICr/ainU8ErPIXD87BZ3r0=; b=fmvA+iiVm8YnjHL5d4RHISg3ZF7kaANeLGU7BEW965Phr2MmQXiMLD1prWeNbN4XsX HndG6ZbIFy1pv+eYPZvSnHLHHH69TgPYQ2F68s2IwnHwdnCFOq8OMbvPigllpppEihJz erd7RBvGUqkMKHagZ4ZJ76RM4xPVZlDA2ffeKudx9LOw07HAkRirGgKCEy5g4YggyC5W jrMutS509D2gFgv3BXhHVHFAoUitQXFFigNsqsP+MWZKl1Jq/03zYOxXC8QZ4nJi4wTE Q7byFOnoDO/ROdDxbIZNAqCzXnpr8yeif5GNHmVSnBZFWTdxJ1bBWebRYNG7dh0cwRUZ mZUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :organization:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Xy7l/nZ7towEIui2/8Pe4ICr/ainU8ErPIXD87BZ3r0=; b=VR+M1eKU4cnJk7Dii1wLqvvMnurlrgKwOLNJ8z8RfRiQqgxbwwNG6NVnsnyt6TH36Y W0IrW9TPxbWPYktoLXIwdQnAWhNeL5x08e/oc/6g5kc161RJ3323sF8IhFnx9tx+cw6w E4/OJlOQBXsdg0badxvo4YJvpWTeJKD4Z+CJMsjWYRZwtW+4c/Bu11kdK6AwGJEo3KIa GCMjA6L2dvirGtb/uk3Irh+dv/zUUgbbDGLylCKs4yzXmEJ+Dx6ysyoJXuX81dp4IRPM N7gLQB7fdsif3NrkGdkWrQG49+asmX+Cp5/VyUrjf9IQAAwcDLW5IpyFCMW2pO/HWo5w FiKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKUeG+zAq56Ej3bD0GUJvNh/GDZWzFqfLTK/9Df6jJkz+ZKD3oDT3+Rj9+XadBj9A== X-Received: by 10.28.137.148 with SMTP id l142mr10343675wmd.40.1458509984276; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.local (8ta-246-169-15.telkomadsl.co.za. [41.246.169.15]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ka7sm22413905wjb.8.2016.03.20.14.39.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: David Naylor From: David Naylor To: kwm@freebsd.org, dumbbell@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: graphics/s2tc vs graphics/libtxc_dxtn Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:39:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5788982.TZRZe4S4GE@dragon.local> Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-RELEASE-p9; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3002293.WjIijCZZn3"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:47 -0000 --nextPart3002293.WjIijCZZn3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, While addressing a user reported issue with i386-wine-staging I created a port based on the GitHub repo https://github.com/divVerent/s2tc to provide the libtxc_dxtn library. I now realise that I erroneously committed a port that duplicates graphics/libtxc_dxtn. Given that these ports are not identical I suggest we merge the ports and drop one of them. To describe the major differences: graphics/s2tc: + Based on a newer version of upstream (at 20151228) + Provides the s2tc tools (including man pages) + Has working (and passing) unit tests graphics/libtxc_dxtn: - Does not provide the s2tc tools (explicitly intended) I am in favour of keeping s2tc if we include the tools, otherwise think we should drop that port. Regards, David --nextPart3002293.WjIijCZZn3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJW7xicXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ5NDhFQzUxMUEyN0YwMzAyRTc5OUI1M0FB RDYzRkE4REQ2QjJEQTU1AAoJEK1j+o3WstpVv08P/3HGHWwB+E3YJA6SkH8wllKG DL2yaooqrmuh1KINU8N3zz3r5U612S+eR4YfgydLk15iwSl+r1f/POQ6PeXP4PNa pA/CJcnrGGzx8epVnK2eOpKa5hQXPE7UM1Ls/33hLGCPU1xP3wCvXtmk5BSgyJOv ZI7pzSPj/Fz4SKUZv2SPhoG1EIjv7H04y9i+SJ7flVU+5gYOC6hAM1n5jbyc/EQ4 sdvQdl9p6zo8FqVO/+JjuAWNKTCNxsEgFT35GKdd+61YebdyRElmyCUa7esHlsGR Br7rnqwupnWSTx22uptpDpWn/znS7I6/+djk1OmWvTfMVXtJtBRDlJ7Lqt+oebUN Smcplc3LhTVoWuMKH8Nzgm66zeo6jQnNMBdDtF2UgMU6+YZX7iZ69gTPzLsSrSAV Tq+YiAYS0Dy4GzvM+oXIpHKfprZfGiWzJjOUypfTgTGIkkhgHyccEupDzr1AivVa hWOGJWwrLtaXB3UlLvYzp/wFS5nTHGx1NBxRtRbQueBVvIzZWOIl5yhXdYQ8+56W Cz/Mp8uD2A9kh5I+fj21U4caZ3xI5FcRMQSYC/YZHLJsDfs92ahfYo3bX+TM6U2P Dszkh8QnChL3ntHrTsTdvVIu/buC5K4bhnom1XdHx0pN8bUqM6INyARWJkP0BwnE FCYeNOnCasTBnOs1SVlE =YgZ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3002293.WjIijCZZn3--