From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 05:47:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 507AA417 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 05:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C2317A3 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 05:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fa1so23663139pad.40 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=knFzYMc2FPE/Gh+Nh982P7cgRd1K42BtdzdOnWopQ5Y=; b=YZccfBlivpApg0ywCaNtXAUJCz+9ZCTJRbc8FjsvwfSWc7RuipYBR8VLWPqavxrIYR A6S4kCVeJs/buR+sxCqGtsvxVSnwqaStvcgxhXFHq5uE7lYYoLHsGdC3OxEeM7mmHZQM 7hpkFORQEdk3lI9DCujMVGxOcBuJ3fkGPhoKHXBye401tQZXI8Dh5atjki1Lj3eno+UP Wt5AOcMIs38tdHhfl/nRPIIy4GoiU+WIokLdK7k/ruXCRBABuA5EVvc0VHPIwFdrL+9B MnOOAbTMXnRTTJNkVxxNCgBpdxoJULo1/Uf6U5ti2F57lK9EWMq+MvAapEz8mZYX1Z9u 3gfQ== X-Received: by 10.70.94.228 with SMTP id df4mr19013393pdb.64.1409982446239; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.88.239.179] (mobile-166-137-215-074.mycingular.net. [166.137.215.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cm8sm3215668pdb.95.2014.09.05.22.47.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:47:25 -0700 (PDT) References: <01C283B7-C9AF-4AE8-A192-FBC7C04D207E@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <01C283B7-C9AF-4AE8-A192-FBC7C04D207E@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <215CB3BB-BA4B-41D9-9CBF-FC0FDEE9492C@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257) From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: Building clang in buildworld as part of the bootstrap process -- is it really necessary? Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:47:22 -0700 To: Warner Losh Cc: "freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org" , "conrad.meyer@emc.com" X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:47:27 -0000 > tl;dr: NO. Makes sense. I'll do some poking around and see if things could potentially b= e optimized with the clang build. On beefy machines it's not a big deal, but= as we know on machines without a ton of memory or SSDs, it can become painf= ul, as expected. Thanks :)! -Garrett=