Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:08:34 +0000
From:      RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portmaster some_port vs. portmaster 'some_port*'
Message-ID:  <20090114210834.1481eebc@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090114203941.7516d639@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
References:  <20090114203941.7516d639@it.buh.tecnik93.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:39:41 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> Maybe I'm not reading the man page correctly, but I would expect 
> portmaster, if invoked with a wild-card, to:
> - first update the dependencies of the ports matched by the
> 'some_port*' it gets on the command line
> - then to update the ports matched by said wild-card in dependency
> order.

Logically it should work through all relevant ports in dependency
order, which is not the same thing as your two-stage build. 

The way you expected it to work doesn't guarantee  dependency order.
Think about the the dependency order FooA -> Bar -> FooB and the
wildcard Foo*  



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090114210834.1481eebc>