From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Mar 3 18:16:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA16908 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16903 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4) id VAA00986; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21:16:34 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199703040216.VAA00986@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) To: taob@risc.org (Brian Tao) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21:16:34 -0500 (EST) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from Brian Tao at "Mar 3, 97 09:05:17 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > Damn annoying. Although genx claims the next client is much faster > > on intel and alpha platforms, so we should be able to vault over it, > > if they are correct. > > The 233-MHz PPro running FreeBSD is still easily the fastest > individual CPU on the list though. Now all we need is someone to run > 3.0-SMP on a 8-node PPro233 system to blow away that E6000 you just > added to the list. :) I could add 3 more processors actually, but I gotta leave some open. Unfortunatly I probably will not be able to leave the code running for a long period of time, but I wanted to be at the top for a few hours anyway :) I also wanted to see if I could move vex up a notch. -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich