From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Dec 13 04:57:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7DB4AD3F7 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CtshC1Y9sz4tYP for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3512E4ADB39; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D9F4AD9DC for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CtshC0wSKz4tbq for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E66E1F11 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0BD4vEv2083945 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0BD4vESU083944 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251796] bsd.port.mk: make on unmaintained port outputs a URL that returns "Page Not Found" Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 04:57:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251796 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|make on unmaintained port |bsd.port.mk: make on |outputs a URL that returns |unmaintained port outputs a |"Page Not Found" |URL that returns "Page Not | |Found" --- Comment #2 from Mark Linimon --- (In reply to Phil Budne from comment #1) Bugmeister notes: since it is in Mk/*.mk, yes, it's "Ports Framework". But really it does not make as much difference as people assume -- in general, the same people loo= k at ports PRs in both "Individual Ports" and "Ports Framework". The choice to only show the former is intentional, due to the high number of errors when people submit PRs. My personal opinion is that "Package Infrastructure" should never be shown = to the general public. It was intended only for "issues affecting the build machines @FreeBSD.org" and has never really been used for that purpose, ins= tead only attracting false positives. If you want to file a bug for the bugmeisters to look at, use Services/Bug Tracker. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=