From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Nov 23 15:40:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA18657 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 15:40:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA18650 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 15:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA20297; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 16:40:05 -0700 Message-Id: <199611232340.QAA20297@clem.systemsix.com> X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 From: Steve Passe To: dg@Root.COM cc: freebsd-smp@freefall.freebsd.org, Peter Wemm Subject: Re: SMP -current merge In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Nov 1996 15:23:25 PST." <199611232323.PAA02050@root.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 16:40:05 -0700 Sender: owner-smp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, > "man idprio" > > idprio is a compliment to rtprio. It was an idea I had back when the >rtprio code was first submitted. I've always hated "nice" because it was >never possible to say "run this process _only_ if nothing else is runnable". Ok, so something does need to change. as most of us probably never run anything at idleprio the patch I submitted is better than nothing. Possibilities: a 4th queue that is just for cpuidle[ NCPU ] procs. ??? -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | FreeBSD -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzHe7tEAAAEEAM274wAEEdP+grIrV6UtBt54FB5ufifFRA5ujzflrvlF8aoE 04it5BsUPFi3jJLfvOQeydbegexspPXL6kUejYt2OeptHuroIVW5+y2M2naTwqtX WVGeBP6s2q/fPPAS+g+sNZCpVBTbuinKa/C4Q6HJ++M9AyzIq5EuvO0a8Rr9AAUR tBlTdGV2ZSBQYXNzZSA8c21wQGNzbi5uZXQ+ =ds99 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----