Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:15:42 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, "Lin, Ming M" <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Subject: Re: fixup for missing C1 in _CST Message-ID: <4CDC6B0E.4090507@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858BC5E9503@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <4CDC25F2.6080409@freebsd.org> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858BC5E94D3@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858BC5E9503@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 11/11/2010 22:39 Moore, Robert said the following: > Oops, missed it. > > "_CST defines ascending C-states..." > > Could it be that the problem is that the platform is returning a _CST package that is not sorted or even is sorted descending? In the particular case that I wanted to address _CST returned just one entry with C2 type. I guess that it's hard to enumerate all possible BIOS/vendor bugs :-) -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDC6B0E.4090507>