From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 19 15:01:06 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA02565 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 15:01:06 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA02525 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 15:00:43 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA10858; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 14:56:20 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199509192156.OAA10858@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Coding style ( was Re: why is this not a bug in namei?) To: mrcpu@cdsnet.net (Jaye Mathisen) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 14:56:20 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, davidg@root.com, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Jaye Mathisen" at Sep 19, 95 02:44:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 880 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The real question is does this have to be bashed around on hackers... > Seems like a basically religious issue, which deserves it's own majordomo > list... No, this is Nate taking up David's Ad Homin attack on my coding style, which obfuscated the original issue of 16 bit Unicode characters in the kernel. Overall coding style is a matter for an indent program built into the "cvs commit" procedure. The question "how do I determine program flow when I see a goto?" is a stupid question. The *real* question is whether we want to be able to mount Win95 and Windows NT file systems. or not. It has nothing to do with whether I use "too many" goto's in fixing code I wouldn't be in in the first place if it functioned correctly. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.