From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 22 01:14:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E761D37B401; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B3043F85; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19esHu-0003kK-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:14:22 +0200 Received: from [80.132.230.157] (helo=Gatekeeper.FreeBSD.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19esHu-0002OX-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:14:22 +0200 Received: from StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org (StefanEsser [10.0.0.1]) by Gatekeeper.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1214E5F1A; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:14:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org (Postfix, from userid 200) id 610AA1EB4; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:14:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:14:19 +0200 From: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= To: Mark Santcroos Message-ID: <20030722081419.GD999@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> References: <3F1CB6AF.8030608@sbh.eng.br> <20030722074329.GA999@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> <20030722074724.GC690@laptop.6bone.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030722074724.GC690@laptop.6bone.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org cc: Marcus Grando Subject: Re(2): DWL-520+ and others cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:14:25 -0000 On 2003-07-22 09:47 +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:43:29AM +0200, Stefan E?er wrote: > > I had a look and found, that the driver comes under a > > BSD licence and that BSD is mentioned as a target OS! > > See ath(4) in -CURRENT. Hmmm, did you think the DWL-520+ was supported by the ath driver ? It is not. It's one of those games played by WLAN card manufacturers. They often keep the name of the card, but change chips over time. The DWL-520+ is a 802.11b+ card (i.e. 22Mbps with TI chip). The original DWL-520 was based on the PRISM II chip, according to wi(4). The DWL-AB520 / DWL-AG520 are based on Atheros chips and supported by ath(4). It's worse with other brands. There are lots of card models that used be supported by wi(4) but newer versions of the card use the TI chip without *any* change in the product name ... Regards, STefan