Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:19:52 -0400 From: Ryan Moeller <freqlabs@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does a ZFS change in head require additional work? Message-ID: <b530785c-6473-ddd9-66c3-d70e7eaaaba1@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <QB1PR01MB336483AD6933D9A993D0C92BDD9A0@QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> References: <QB1PR01MB336483AD6933D9A993D0C92BDD9A0@QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/16/20 9:39 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > r362158 changed the arguments for zfs_checkexp() in head. > There were no other changes, since the arguments are simply > passed on to vfs_stdcheckexp(). > > Is there something else that needs to be done, > such as sending this patch upstream? > > rick Yes please do upstream this! The FreeBSD snapshot for head used by the CI bot was broken this week (in libc) so your change to the KPI has managed to fly under the radar. We'll need this merged upstream before I update the FreeBSD ports for OpenZFS. Thanks for the reminder! -Ryan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b530785c-6473-ddd9-66c3-d70e7eaaaba1>