From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 7 11:57:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCDF37B400 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5FCEA44; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:57:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:57:10 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: lewwid Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH Updated from base releng_4_5, problem. Message-ID: <20020307195710.GA41605@hellblazer.nectar.cc> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , lewwid , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 12:50:48PM -0700, lewwid wrote: > Tag was SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.9 FreeBSD localisations 20011201 (or whatever) > now it's > SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.9 FreeBSD localisations 20020307. > > Why is it still showing 2.9 ? I wanted to stay with base but do I need the port? Because it is still OpenSSH 2.9. However, it is 2.9 with all known bugs fixed, including the one to which the advisory referred. That is why the `localisations' string was bumped: so that one can distinguish it from the unpatched version. -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message