From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Nov  3  7:20:47 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61BC14D21
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 1999 07:20:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id HAA49492;
	Wed, 3 Nov 1999 07:20:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 07:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199911031520.HAA49492@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
Subject: Re: misc/10325: Implementation of itoa() for libc
Reply-To: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR misc/10325; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: misc/10325: Implementation of itoa() for libc
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:20:26 -0500

 Actually,
 
 Under no circumstance should this go into libc. The function is not
 standard so it might go into libcompat. After talking this out, I'm not
 sure if it should be in FreeBSD at all though.
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message