From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Jun 14 10:18:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from venus.vincentjardin.net (AVelizy-102-1-1-80.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.253.255.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8695E37B41F for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by venus.vincentjardin.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 41FDD15039F; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:27:47 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Vincent Jardin To: Harti Brandt Subject: Re: HE622 and HE155 Drivers Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:27:47 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org References: <20020614083839.E46969-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> In-Reply-To: <20020614083839.E46969-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020614172747.41FDD15039F@venus.vincentjardin.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I have an NATM and netgraph-ATM driver for the HE cards. It's tested with > HE155, code is there for the HE622. Don't know about PCI64. The cards are > excellent. Thanks. I have checked your source code. The idea of Netgraph ATM (ng_atm) is great. It looks simple to feed the PDU of the AAL5/CPCS with whatever payload, just like the ng_ether node. However what is the advantage on the HARP/ATM kernel sockets ? I think that the following architecture would be more simple, don't you ? \ \ / / ng_XXXX | ng_ksocket According to you, how difficult would it be if I wanted to port this drivers for the HARP stack ? Is your driver based on the Marconi's source code for the HE155 ? Why are the ATM drivers stack specific ? Vincent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message