Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:27:47 +0200 From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@wanadoo.fr> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HE622 and HE155 Drivers Message-ID: <20020614172747.41FDD15039F@venus.vincentjardin.net> In-Reply-To: <20020614083839.E46969-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> References: <20020614083839.E46969-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have an NATM and netgraph-ATM driver for the HE cards. It's tested with
> HE155, code is there for the HE622. Don't know about PCI64. The cards are
> excellent.
Thanks. I have checked your source code. The idea of Netgraph ATM (ng_atm) is
great. It looks simple to feed the PDU of the AAL5/CPCS with whatever
payload, just like the ng_ether node.
However what is the advantage on the HARP/ATM kernel sockets ?
I think that the following architecture would be more simple, don't you ?
\ \ / /
ng_XXXX
|
ng_ksocket
According to you, how difficult would it be if I wanted to port this drivers
for the HARP stack ?
Is your driver based on the Marconi's source code for the HE155 ?
Why are the ATM drivers stack specific ?
Vincent
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020614172747.41FDD15039F>