From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 21:41:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9698716A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:41:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.pennswoods.net (mail2.pennswoods.net [12.163.95.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA8143D58 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ccarver@pennswoods.net) Received: from [10.32.1.80] (inferno.pennswoods.net [205.247.239.242]) by mail2.pennswoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B017516351C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:41:30 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Carver To: doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1099690564.20404.23.camel@pcbf80-10321.priv.pennswoods.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 16:36:04 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Possible Typo? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ccarver@pennswoods.net List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:41:32 -0000 Hello, In section 14.9.3 paragraph 2: "The IPFW sample rule set (found in /etc/rc.firewall) delivered in the basic install is outdated, complicated and does not use stateful rules on the interface facing the public Internet. It exclusively uses legacy stateless rules which only have the ability to open or close the service ports. The IPFW example stateful rules sets presented here supercede the /etc/firewall.rc file distributed with the system." Is the mention of /etc/firewall.rc in the last sentence a typo? The file distributed with the system is rc.firewall as mentioned earlier, correct? Sorry if I misunderstood. -- Chris Carver Pennswoods.net Network Engineer