From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 17:39:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6835116A4CF; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:39:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F8E43D48; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:39:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA6HdNJv055206; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:39:23 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:39:23 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_B=F6ck?= In-Reply-To: <418C8EEC.5040403@freenet.de> Message-ID: <20041106203635.G19392@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <418C18F6.9030200@FreeBSD.org> <418C8EEC.5040403@freenet.de> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Ade Lovett Subject: Re: HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 17:39:26 -0000 On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Sebastian B?ck wrote: SB> Ade Lovett wrote: SB> > FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged SB> > databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5) as DEPRECATED, with it SB> > being removed from the tree on or about 1st January 2005. SB> > SB> > You are *strongly* urged to upgrade to either 7.3.x or 7.4.x SB> SB> Have you considered that 7.2 is the last Version that doesn't have SB> schemas. Out there may be some / are lot of applications that depend SB> on this behaviour. SB> SB> I'd vote not to remove the port. SB> SB> Just my personal opinion Hmm, have you any info regarding schema-aware postgresql doing counter-intuitive when not using dot-notation? The only thing I'm thinking about is splitting system relations and user relations between two schemas in 7.4, but even that should not be an issue as lookup method is (or at least seems) safe to this. Any thoughts? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------