From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 11 11:30:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD54816A4CE for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477E143D53 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (7b749b7115905def577273a90847d8ac@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4BITbZq005200; Tue, 11 May 2004 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B48C51CE5; Tue, 11 May 2004 11:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:30:54 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tijl Coosemans Message-ID: <20040511183054.GB33350@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040511010823.GB72214@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040511152304.201425e3.tijl@ulyssis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040511152304.201425e3.tijl@ulyssis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ports-sparc64@bento.FreeBSD.org: libticables-3.7.7_2 failed on sparc64 5] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:30:56 -0000 --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 03:23:04PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Apparently src/sys/sparc64/include/sysarch.h uses utrap_entry_t and > utrap_handler_t without defining them. They are however defined in > src/sys/sparc64/utrap.h. >=20 > So I'm wondering, should I file a PR for my port to include > machine/utrap.h before machine/sysarch.h in case of a sparc64 build > (or get rid of it since it is only used on i386), or should I file a > PR for src/sys/sparc64/include/sysarch.h to include machine/utrap.h > (probably wrapped inside an #ifndef _KERNEL)? Thanks for investigating the problem. You should ask for advice from the sparc64@ mailing list. Kris --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAoRveWry0BWjoQKURAtJNAJ4zw/gZ93PFYM7/BvvTfMQJ5B2NCwCeNtHD 8OI0ukrS+xZUhla3uM2mEPQ= =77EJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK--