From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb  9 14:24:57 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA19309
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA19296
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA21634; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:23:53 -0800
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: phk@critter.tfs.com, julian@ref.tfs.com, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Feb 1996 09:20:39 MST."
             <199602091620.JAA10495@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 14:23:53 -0800
Message-ID: <21631.823904633@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> By this argument, we should restrict ourselves to strict SVR3
> compatability; after all, there are more SCO boxes than any other
> UNIX or UNIX-clone system in existance.

Sorry, Terry - you're having a different argument from the one
I'm having.  Come back when you're in sync. :-)

						Jordan