From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 05:30:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B95316A4CE; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:30:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C38E43D3F; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@t2t2.com) Received: from t2t2.com (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j125Uk2n084529; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:30:48 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@t2t2.com) Message-ID: <42006745.3070904@t2t2.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 13:38:13 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: threads@freebsd.org cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Backport of pthread fixes from 5.x to 6.0. X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 05:30:50 -0000 Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Petri Helenius wrote: > > >>John Baldwin wrote: >> >> >>>I'd like to backport most of the thread fixes for libpthread from 6.0 to >>>RELENG_5 before 5.4. I've been testing this patch locally and just wanted to >>>make sure backporting it was ok with the folks on this list. Patch is at >>>http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/pthread_5.patch >>> >>> >>> >> >>I browsed trough the patch and couldn't locate the new mutex operations >>in there. Are they somewhere in the pipeline and could you combine them >>into your patch? > > > They aren't (in userland) even in -current; they exist in perforce > in a forked branch of libpthread. You'll have to wait for that > because it doesn't yet support all of the stuff that libpthread does. > I am slowing working on this, but if anyone has interest to work on this, let me know, mostly I want to support PRIORITY pthread mutex in umtx code and other realtime options. David