Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:57:37 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <dmiller@sparks.net> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Reverend K Kanno <presence@churchofinformationwarfare.org>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LUN 1 on 3.2-R? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012111456100.8976-100000@search.sparks.net> In-Reply-To: <200012111950.eBBJols02740@aslan.scsiguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >> The lack of a peripheral driver doesn't have anything to do with > >> whether luns are supported or not. It also doesn't preclude the > >> system from talking to the array as a disk. David seemed to > >> imply that the Chapparal arrays didn't work *at all*. Actually that was Reverend K Kanno. > > > >Uh, if they report themselves as Processor type, they won't attach as disk: > > Only the control port on these devices is processor type. That makes sense, except that I have a da0 and a pass1 and pass2: pass1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 1 pass1: <CHAPTEC G5312 G2.2> Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device pass1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled pass2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 2 pass2: <JMR ELEC FORTRA SERIES. 1.00> Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device pass2: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit) Why that second array would come up as a processor type is quite the mystery. --- David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0012111456100.8976-100000>