From owner-freebsd-chat Sun May 9 20:25:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D472A14DEC for ; Sun, 9 May 1999 20:25:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freyes@inch.com) Received: from your-name (TC2-dial-65-215.oldslip.inch.com [207.240.215.65]) by arutam.inch.com (8.9.1a/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA03729 for ; Sun, 9 May 1999 23:25:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199905100325.XAA03729@arutam.inch.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "FreeBSd Chat list" Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 23:18:06 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ethernet card with TCP stack built in Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Just saw an interesting link in slashdot about an ethernet card with built in TCP stack: http://www.interprophet.com/demo.html The makers of the card claim that in a test VS a regular NIC they were able to push about twice as much data with about 1/9th the utilization in the CPU. Does a regular NIC card takes so many CPU cycles? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message