From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 10 08:50:59 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9BE37B401
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBFC243FB1
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 22168 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 15:50:57 -0000
Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70)
  by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 15:50:57 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:47:20 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: harti@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20030410113602.K472@odysseus.silby.com>
Message-ID: <20030410114643.O472@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <20030409114957.GN83126@cicely9.cicely.de>   
	<20030409200025.K472@odysseus.silby.com>
	<20030410113602.K472@odysseus.silby.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject: Re: realtime problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:51:00 -0000


On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote:

>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Harti Brandt wrote:
>
> > MS>Harti, you're more than welcome to investigate and see if those changes
> > MS>reduce delay for you. :)
> >
> > With this patch I get the following timing:
>
> The patch I posted was not all inclusive, and did not touch all of the mii
> code.  You should doublecheck to see if the PHY type of your NIC was
> patched or not.
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack

Hm, wait, the patch I sent should have affected exphy, which is why newer
3Coms use...

What were your timing results before the change vs after?

Mike "Silby" Silbersack