Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:13:25 +0100 From: tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: console-only freebsd Message-ID: <20171010171325.GA90359@acer.zyxst.net> In-Reply-To: <20171011005715.D20901@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20171007142019.GA19356@v007.zyxst.net> <CAOjFWZ63omYQya34Kk-nAVGvo7cn6CuYyxUFk_0L13o_hGk0vA@mail.gmail.com> <3849a428c5f41c728effa2f85510c26e@ultimatedns.net> <20171010134149.GB70456@acer.zyxst.net> <20171011005715.D20901@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:29:05AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: >More likely for it and similar things to work using sc rather than vt ? you're right. Much simpler to stick with a minimal xorg. thanks, -- J.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171010171325.GA90359>