From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 15:40:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 21D7D106566B; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:40:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20110622154007.GA14515@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110621214013.6cc4760e@heavennet.ru> <20110622020048.GA83940@FreeBSD.org> <20110622064224.GB94185@FreeBSD.org> <20110622160233.8b6156e1.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Ilya A. Arkhipov" , Ion-Mihai Tetcu , kwm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenTTD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:40:07 -0000 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > Just to satisfy a nagging question inside me (I'm sorry, you're going > to regret having me around!). > > Do you mean: > > BUILD_DEPENDS > LIB_DEPENDS > RUN_DEPENDS > USE_FOO > USE_BAR > > or > > BUILD_DEPENDS > LIB_DEPENDS > RUN_DEPENDS > > USE_FOO > USE_BAR > > ? > > Apart from the aesthetics appeal of the latter, I also think that > there should be a distinction between the USE and DEPENDS -- only USE > sets cool variables for the Makefile to then use... Of course the latter. See any port that I matinain or had recently touched. ;-) ./danfe