From owner-freebsd-security Fri Aug 27 5:21: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F7B151CF; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 05:20:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA06004; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA37744; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:20:17 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:20:16 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Fernando Schapachnik Cc: dima@best.net, imp@village.org, gsutter@pobox.com, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [secure@FREEBSD.LUBLIN.PL: FreeBSD (and other BSDs?) local root explot] Message-ID: <19990827142016.U79110@bitbox.follo.net> References: <199908261758.KAA94925@burka.rdy.com> <199908271214.JAA00774@ns1.sminter.com.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <199908271214.JAA00774@ns1.sminter.com.ar>; from Fernando Schapachnik on Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 09:14:22AM -0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 09:14:22AM -0300, Fernando Schapachnik wrote: > Patches for 2.2.8 are too much asking? Yes - 2.2.8 doesn't have the problem (AFAIK, at least - feel free to test it if you have easy access and time). Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message