From owner-freebsd-security Tue Aug 6 20:42:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA00610 for security-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 20:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ec.camitel.com ([206.231.123.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA00590 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jaba.ec.camitel.com (m0.ec.camitel.com [206.231.123.150]) by ec.camitel.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA01415; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 23:39:54 GMT Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 0.5-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199608030513.WAA02366@kdat.calpoly.edu> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 19:27:31 -0000 () Organization: Labyrinthe Bbs 8-) From: Luc Chamberland To: Nathan Lawson Subject: Re: Crack 4.1 patches for FBSD Cc: (Brandon Gillespie) Cc: (Brandon Gillespie) , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I'm actually interested in a 'secure' release of FreeBSD, with daemons not >running as root, no complicated mailers, few to no setuid binaries -- in >essence, what I do to my FreeBSD systems as soon as I install them. > >Unfortunately, I have recently started a very demanding job and do not have >the time to contribute to such a project. My apologies. > >-- >Nate Lawson "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of >CPE Senior evil to one who is striking at the root." >CSL Admin -- Henry David Thoreau, 'Walden', 1854 The FreeBSD on a scale of 10, how many points do you gives for security? FreeBSD seems insecure for you!, this is same for all intruders!!!! Wolfrider []-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=[] | E-Mail : Luc Chamberland | Date: 08/06/96 | Time: 19:27:31 | Programmeur, Electro-Conception []-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=[] Il n'y a pas de jours sans bonheur.... Il n'y a que des jours ou nous sommes aveugles!