From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 13 17:45:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E27D106564A;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.160.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90AA8FC13;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so819551gyf.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=1dFqKhaPLuY2epZnYEO4q7t01HtfOslm+vTHj45gXWY=;
	b=KhAModyUuVqcGsfiJTqsQsAE81nDg9tWaIVgcqIUcgq95AD064ucpUDFPJb4squPGv
	Qz6gfDJ26vqeUvWo1jw/SkQO6YOaLng2NONhoQQm5w50rJzxEfD5inCIHKGBTfqz7q7r
	+O85qP2DPIHx3BF2W/waLNtQ0BEtFrxB18QLM=
Received: by 10.231.6.168 with SMTP id 40mr205285ibz.71.1315935907096; Tue, 13
	Sep 2011 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: utisoft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.61.148 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201109122119.p8CLIEjZ095398@fire.js.berklix.net>
References: <4E6A3986.6030505@FreeBSD.org>
	<201109122119.p8CLIEjZ095398@fire.js.berklix.net>
From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mPmq68aBJsxymef8Zjfv9mqcx8A
Message-ID: <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:45:08 -0000

On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported =
in
>> >> the first place).
>> >
>> > Bullshit!
>>
>> I think that suffices. =A0If the discussion is getting emotional, we
>> should stop it.
>
> No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked.
> FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers.
>

Julian,

Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't
think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them.

Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break.

Chris