Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:48:16 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl>, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <op.wkt0iqpj34t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:00:08 -0500, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote: > We are really behind the curve here. Git assumes (correctly) that > disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network > bandwidth. By the time we adopt SVN completely, every serious project > I know of will have moved from subversion to git. Git is available in a hush-hush unsupported fashion for ports and source. I'll warn you: it will take you forever to pull it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wkt0iqpj34t2sn>