Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:48:16 -0500
From:      Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To:        Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl>, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What replaces csup?
Message-ID:  <op.wkt0iqpj34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:00:08 -0500, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>  
wrote:

> We are really behind the curve here.  Git assumes (correctly) that
> disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network
> bandwidth.  By the time we adopt SVN completely, every serious project
> I know of will have moved from subversion to git.

Git is available in a hush-hush unsupported fashion for ports and source.  
I'll warn you: it will take you forever to pull it.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wkt0iqpj34t2sn>