From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 22:32:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C03F106566C; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gkontos.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E1E8FC19; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadk27 with SMTP id k27so11728600iad.13 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:32:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DKRKjp2gNQVMifl50mcZNpaGzkbNjP0Mdg7B1wZUT1o=; b=eS8JwQK5kkSm1RyVxe+rz5U3h9q4c32vhB9BkvXWsV9xzrZho4ithJivRNPKoLaXO4 aYyzYjUxCZ8Vs37Mnb/NJ8qWG1clJyPhI5EtsHkZzgpqVwSmzgeS53EVkIPVgE3mDOiA cTnbKMBO5R0a3pDjiy+Kukj7k1zJskowMJ/6Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.0.221 with SMTP id 29mr13492804ibc.56.1317249147307; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.33.131 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:32:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 01:32:27 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Kontostanos To: Ronald Klop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable , Colin Percival Subject: Re: 9.0-BETA3 and ports db X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:32:28 -0000 On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:13 +0200, George Kontostanos > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Today I upgraded one of my servers from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-BETA3. I >> noticed that after the upgrade portsnap does not fetch Index-9 and I >> had to manually issue the "make fetchindex" command. I remember that >> this was something I had to do when I was running 9-CURRENT a few >> months ago in my desktop PC but I thought that it would be solved by >> now. >> Am I doing something wrong or is this an expected behavior ? >> >> Thanks >> > > It is known. But I don't know when it will be fixed. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149232 > > Ronald. > Ok thanks ! -- George Kontostanos aisecure.net